Search by Keywords x
contact us contact us | home help



 Welcome Guest | Oct 22 2014
 
Home Skip Navigation Links
Search by Database Expand Search by Database
Skip Navigation Links
Subject Modules Expand Subject Modules
Skip Navigation Links
State Modules Expand State Modules
Skip Navigation Links
Legal Focus Expand Legal Focus
 

Login

  

Free Demo

Database Updates
Search by Database
Resources
Subject Modules

Database updates


Judgments

Satpal Singh Bhairupa Bhatinda vs Bar Council of Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Jitender Singh Tomar vs Land & Building Department Govt. of (NCT of Delhi)  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Lalit Kumar Jain vs Land and Building Department Govt. of (NCT of Delhi)  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

Vishal Goyal vs Department of Legal Affairs Government of India  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 15 Oct 2014]

R. K. Jain vs Department of Legal Affairs  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 14 Oct 2014]

(1) Phaya Nath Pandey; (2) Dharmpal vs Union of India and another  [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Palpandi vs Sub Inspector of Police, Kadupatti Police Station, Madurai District  [MADRAS HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Omkar and others vs State of Uttarakhand and another  [UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Bakhtawar Singh vs G. S. Dhall and another  [PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Textile Kamgar Sanghatana, Buttibori Through its President and others vs Hon'ble Member, Industrial Court, Nagpur and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Manoj S/o Narayanrao More vs Committee for Scrutiny & Verification of Tribe Claim, Amravati and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

State Bank of India, Through its Regional Manager/Assistant General Manager, Nagpur vs Central Government Industrial, Nagpur and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

V. Murugesan vs State Represented by Sub Inspector of Police, Rayappanpatti Police Station, Theni District  [MADRAS HIGH COURT, 14 Oct 2014]

Pradeep Kumar Verma vs State of Jharkhand and others  [JHARKHAND HIGH COURT, 13 Oct 2014]

Maniram, Churu vs Economic Affairs, New Delhi  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 13 Oct 2014]

Jigna Mahesh Dedhia vs Union of India Through Secretary, Department of Ministry of External Affairs and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 13 Oct 2014]

(1) Shantaram Shankar Jamsandekar and others; (2) Pravin Dadasaheb Indulkar vs State of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Urban Development, Mumbai  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 13 Oct 2014]

Pradip S/o Samravaji Patil vs First Labour Court, Nagpur and others  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 13 Oct 2014]

Dattatraya S/o Ramchandra Ghawade and others vs State of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mumbai  [BOMBAY HIGH COURT, 13 Oct 2014]

Praveen Jain S/o Late A. K. Jain vs Union of India Through Secretary (Revenue), Department of Revenue, New Delhi and others  [CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, 13 Oct 2014]

T. Mohankumar Borkar vs CPIO EPFO, Regional Office, Bangalore  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 13 Oct 2014]

Rakhi Bharati and another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others  [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, 10 Oct 2014]

Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders vs Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meerut  [SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, 10 Oct 2014]
Administrative - Constitution of India, 1950, art. 142 - NSC - Payment denied on maturity - Legality - On 28-4-1995, M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders purchased one, six years' National Savings Certificate/NSC by investing a sum of Rs.5,000 - NSC was to mature on 28-4-2001 - The maturity amount payable on 28-4-2001 was Rs.10,075 - Since M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders was not paid the amount due on maturity, B.K. Garg made repeated visits to the office from where the NSC was purchased - M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders was informed, that an NSC could only be issued in the name of an individual, and that, the NSC taken in the name of M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders, was not valid - Hence instant appeal.

Held, There was seriously no difficulty at all in the facts and circumstances of the present case, to regularize the defect pointed out, because M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders, is admittedly the sole proprietorship concern of B.K. Garg. The postal authorities should have solicited the change of the name in the NSC, through a representation by B.K. Garg himself. On receipt of such a representation, the alleged irregularity would have been cured, and the beneficiary of the deposit, would have legitimately reaped the fruits thereof. Rather than adopting the above simple course, the postal authorities chose to strictly and rigidly interpret the terms of the scheme. This resulted in the denial of the legitimate claims of the sole proprietor of the appellant concern, i.e., B.K. Garg, of the investment made by him. In the above view of the matter, we consider it just and appropriate, in exercise of our jurisdiction u/art. 142 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meerut, to correct the NSC issued in the name of M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders, by substituting the appellant's name, with that of B.K. Garg. The irregularity having been cured, B.K. Garg will now be released all the payments due to him, in terms of the order passed by the District Forum. The respondent is accordingly directed to pay to B.K. Garg, the maturity amount of Rs.10,075/- with 12% interest, from the date of maturity, till the date of payment. He would be entitled to Rs.5,000/- towards compensation, as was awarded to him by the District Forum. In addition, it is just and appropriate to award him litigation costs of Rs.10,000. Appeal allowed.


H. P. Nanda vs Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Govt. of (NCT of Delhi)  [CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION, 10 Oct 2014]

Faraha and another vs State of Uttar Pradesh and others  [ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, 10 Oct 2014]



Copyright © 1997-2014 | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer